Cardano founder Charles Hoskinson has returned to a familiar disagreement with Gemini after an anniversary message from the exchange’s cofounder. His response brought the missing ADA listing back into discussion, alongside a question Gemini has not publicly answered: why does Cardano remain unavailable on its platform?
Several possible explanations have circulated, from listing requirements to business priorities and strained relations. Each deserves consideration, but none establishes the exchange’s actual reason for excluding ADA.
What you'll learn 👉
Gemini’s Listing Policies Do Not Explain Cardano’s Exclusion
Gemini decides which digital assets it supports, and its selection process considers several factors. BSCN’s report names liquidity, demand, utility, regulation, and other requirements among the exchange’s listing criteria.
Those categories help explain how an exchange might evaluate a token. Liquidity concerns whether customers can trade without large price differences, demand concerns potential customer interest, and utility concerns what the asset does. Regulatory requirements can also affect availability.
However, a general policy does not explain a specific decision. Saying Cardano failed Gemini’s internal requirements would require evidence that the exchange evaluated ADA and rejected it for that reason.
Gemini’s published asset list does not explain why Cardano is excluded. The missing listing therefore leaves an unanswered question, without proving that ADA failed a particular requirement.
Community Theories About Competing Interests Remain Unconfirmed
The Reddit discussion referenced in the context offers another possible explanation. Some users suspect business priorities or competing interests could influence Gemini’s asset selection.
Those comments express community opinions. They do not establish that Gemini deliberately excludes ADA to favour another cryptocurrency.
The distinction matters because outsiders cannot fully observe an exchange’s commercial decisions. Customer demand, technical resources, and expected revenue can all influence which assets receive support. However, identifying a possible factor does not prove it determined the outcome.
The available information supports these conclusions:
- Community comments describe theories about Gemini’s decisions.
- Those theories do not establish deliberate favouritism.
- Gemini’s actual reason remains publicly unexplained.
Presenting those suspicions as confirmed motives would make the Cardano listing dispute appear more settled than the evidence allows.
Hoskinson’s Public Criticism Does Not Explain Gemini’s Decision
Charles Hoskinson has previously criticised Gemini over its data breach and problems involving Genesis. Those remarks provide background to the tension between the Cardano founder and the exchange.
Public criticism could make a corporate relationship less friendly. However, that possibility does not establish a connection between Hoskinson’s comments and Gemini’s ADA listing decision.
The sequence of events alone cannot prove motive. Criticism and continued exclusion may occur during the same period without the criticism being the reason for the exclusion.
Gemini would need to explain its decision before that connection could be treated as fact. Until then, Hoskinson’s comments help explain the tone of the disagreement, but they do not resolve the question about ADA availability.
Read Also: Solana News: Midnight Brings Private DeFi as Institutional Tools Expand
Gemini’s Cardano Education Does Not Promise ADA Trading
Gemini has also published Cardano educational content through Cryptopedia, its cryptocurrency education platform. That confirms the exchange covers the project within its educational material.
However, an educational article does not establish that ADA trading is planned or that a listing announcement is close.
Education and exchange support serve different purposes. An article can explain a cryptocurrency without committing the platform to offer deposits, custody, or trading for that asset.
The practical distinction is straightforward:
- Cardano education confirms coverage on Cryptopedia.
- ADA trading requires a separate exchange decision.
- Educational coverage provides no confirmed listing timetable.
A Cryptopedia article therefore cannot serve as evidence that Cardano will soon become available on Gemini. An official announcement would provide a much clearer answer.
BSCN Reports Hoskinson Renewed His ADA Listing Demand
BSCN reported that Hoskinson responded to an anniversary message shared by Gemini cofounder Tyler Winklevoss with the words “List ADA.” His brief response renewed the public request for Gemini to support Cardano.
Cardano Founder Calls Out Gemini Over ADA Listing Cardano (@Cardano) founder Charles Hoskinson (@IOHK_Charles) has renewed criticism of Gemini’s decision to exclude cardano:native. He posted “List ADA” after Gemini co-founder Tyler Winklevoss shared an anniversary message. Gemini’s listing policy considers liquidity, demand, utility, regulation, and other factors. The exchange has never publicly explained why ADA remains unavailable on its platform. Hoskinson has previously argued Gemini lost significant revenue by excluding ADA trading.
— BSCN (@BSCNews) October 7, 2026
The report also notes that Hoskinson has previously argued Gemini lost revenue by excluding ADA trading. That is his commercial argument, and the information provided does not independently establish how much revenue the exchange could have earned.
His reasoning is that ADA trading could generate activity and fees for Gemini. However, potential revenue would depend on customer demand, trading volume, fee levels, and the costs of supporting the asset.
The latest request also provides no confirmation that Gemini intends to act. A public call from Cardano’s founder is different from an exchange announcement.
FAQs
Subscribe to our YouTube channel for daily crypto updates, market insights, and expert analysis.
