Popular analyst Alex Mason has pointed to a striking gap between silver prices in the U.S. and China, and argued that the spread may be telling us something important about physical demand.
On October 5, COMEX silver traded around $61 per ounce, yet the Shanghai benchmark was close to $69 per ounce. That put Shanghai silver at a premium of roughly 12%-13% over the U.S. market. Independent pricing data also showed Shanghai’s benchmark near $68.99, so the core price gap in Mason’s post is real.
The bigger question is what that gap actually means.
What you'll learn 👉
Shanghai Silver Is Trading at a Huge Premium
The chart compares the two markets side by side.
COMEX silver sits near the low-$60s, with the intraday chart still showing weakness after a broader correction.
Shanghai silver price, by contrast, is priced close to $69.
That difference is unusually large.
Normally, big price gaps between major markets create an arbitrage opportunity. Traders can buy the cheaper asset in one market and sell it in the more expensive one, which tends to pull the two prices back together.
But that process is not always immediate in physical commodities.
Shipping costs, taxes, import restrictions, contract specifications, delivery rules, currency conversion, and local supply conditions can all keep prices separated for longer than traders might expect.
So Mason is right to focus on the spread, but the existence of a 12% premium does not automatically prove that COMEX pricing is broken.
Read also: Here’s Where Gold and Silver Prices Might be Headed This Week
Physical Demand Is the Bigger Story
Mason’s main argument is that China’s premium may reflect strong demand for actual metal.
That idea is plausible.
Shanghai has been trading at a double-digit premium over COMEX for much of the past month, not just for a few minutes on one session. Recent data showed the premium staying in the 11%-15% area across multiple trading days.
That persistence is more interesting than a one-off pump.
🚨 THIS HAS NEVER HAPPENED BEFORE Silver has reached the point where the math no longer works: COMEX silver: $61.44 Shanghai physical silver: $68.99 That’s a 12.3% premium. At the same time, Shanghai delivery demand just hit an ALL-TIME HIGH: +142% vs the 30-day average. COMEX open interest is still above $535 MILLION. NOW CONNECT THE DOTS: – Physical demand is at record highs. – Shanghai is paying 12.3% MORE for silver. And the paper market is still pricing the same metal at $61.44. THAT SPREAD SHOULD NOT EXIST. In a healthy market, arbitrage closes a 12.3% gap FAST. Buy cheap in one market. Sell expensive in the other. Spread disappears. But it isn’t disappearing. Why? Because this is no longer just a PRICE problem. It’s a PHYSICAL METAL problem. You can create more paper contracts. You cannot create physical silver overnight. The people closest to the physical market already see what’s happening. Margins + Liquidity − Physical demand + Weak hands are being forced out while physical buyers keep paying a premium. That is the part almost nobody understands. When paper and physical disagree this much, one of them eventually has to reprice. Remember, I’ve been in finance for more than 15 years. When I EXIT the markets completely, I’ll say it here publicly, like I always do. Turn notifications on. Many people will wish they followed me sooner.
— Alex Mason 👁△ (@AlexMasonCrypto) October 5, 2026
If physical buyers in China continue paying a much higher price, it means local demand and available supply are out of balance enough to sustain a premium.
Mason also points to a large jump in delivery demand as another sign that buyers want metal, not only financial exposure.
That claim deserves some caution, because the exact +142% delivery-demand figure is harder to independently verify from the available public data.
Still, the broader price premium itself is clearly visible.
Does This Mean Silver Has to Jump?
Not necessarily.
A persistent Shanghai premium can support a bullish case, but it does not mean COMEX silver must immediately move to $69.
The spread can close in several ways.
Shanghai prices could fall.
COMEX prices could rise.
Or both markets could move toward each other.
That is why saying one side “has to reprice” is directionally fair, but not enough to say which market moves first.
The most bullish outcome would be COMEX silver rising toward Shanghai pricing as physical demand remains strong.
That would put the upper-$60s back in focus quickly.
Silver Chart Analysis
The visual contrast is very clear.
COMEX spent October 5 near $61, and the broader move had been weak for weeks. Shanghai held close to $69, leaving a large gap between the two.
COMEX silver itself has also been volatile. Recent futures data showed the metal trading around $60-$61 after a major correction from much higher levels earlier in the year.
That means the Shanghai premium is developing at a time when Western silver pricing is already under pressure.
If that premium persists, it becomes much harder to dismiss as noise.
Silver Price Outlook
The immediate level to watch is still around $60-$61.
If COMEX silver holds that area and the Shanghai premium remains above 10%, the setup could become more constructive.
A recovery toward $65 would be the first sign that U.S. pricing is starting to catch up.
Above that, the $68-$70 area becomes especially important because that is where Shanghai has recently been trading.
If COMEX silver loses $60 cleanly, though, the divergence could widen even further before it closes.
Mason’s core point is worth watching: the physical and futures markets are currently telling very different stories.
The spread alone does not prove a squeeze is coming.
But if Shanghai keeps paying a double-digit premium and physical demand stays elevated, the silver price may eventually need a much bigger repricing event to bring the two markets closer together.
For more financial news and price predictions, click here.
Subscribe to our YouTube channel for daily crypto updates, market insights, and expert analysis.
