Ethereum is widely regarded as the strongest foundation for tokenization in crypto today. The network commands more than half of the entire on-chain real-world asset sector, supported by established standards, deep liquidity, and institutional activity that continues to pull builders into its orbit. Ethereum price movements often mirror the broader tokenization narrative, shaping how participants view the future of digital ownership.
Kaspa steps into this discussion from a different angle. A crypto enthusiast on X known as Ivan Ivanov believes tokenization demands more than adoption alone; it requires an infrastructure designed for absolute decentralization and long-term security. His view introduces a new argument about where tokenized real estate, financial instruments, and high-value ownership records might find their most reliable home.
Ethereum built the early blueprint for tokenization. ERC standards, DeFi interoperability, and massive stablecoin liquidity helped create an ecosystem where ownership rights could move on-chain. ETH price strength reflects a network trusted by institutions, which rely on its broad liquidity and established tooling.
Ivan Ivanov recognizes this but questions whether tokenization’s next chapter can rely on the same system. His argument centers on the long-term reliability of token storage. Kaspa token supporters believe KAS offers a structure that suits tokenized assets because the network focuses on decentralization above convenience. KAS price becomes less important compared to the security principles behind the chain.
Kaspa Structure and Why Ivan Ivanov Sees an Advantage
Kaspa delivers a block-DAG architecture that allows high speed without handing control to centralized decision makers. Ivan Ivanov emphasizes that tokenized assets represent ownership, and ownership cannot depend on off-chain sequencers or stake-weighted influence. He believes Kaspa solves these concerns by removing structural chokepoints.
Kaspa price movements do not form the core of his argument; he concentrates on network design. The promise he describes revolves around how tokenization should sit on a platform where no group or validator set can influence settlement order.
One of the most powerful use cases for the ultimate decentralized infrastructure that $KAS Kaspa is building is assets tokenization.
— Ivan Ivanov (@Uns7oPpabl3_) December 8, 2025
This is a market which practically digitalizes all types of assets by producing their immutable and unique image on cryptographical infrastructure… pic.twitter.com/4TsSJA6fdD
Ethereum remains the dominant chain, yet Ivan Ivanov points out structural traits that may cause problems for tokenization at scale. Block production timing, MEV exposure, transaction ordering, and centralized rollups form the basis of his concerns. Ethereum strength does not eliminate these technical realities.
Kaspa introduces an alternative path. KAS token sits on a network free from centralized sequencers, stake-controlled governance, or slow confirmation cycles. This aligns with Ivan Ivanov’s claim that tokenized real estate and financial instruments need an environment where manipulation cannot occur through transaction ordering.
Ethereum Legitimacy vs Kaspa Token Scarcity Argument
Ivan Ivanov adds another point that strengthens his case: scarcity. He expects KAS to become one of the scarcest assets by 2030. The argument suggests that scarcity amplifies long-term confidence for developers choosing a tokenization platform. This does not revolve around speculation; instead, he links scarcity to trust in the chain’s economic base.
Kaspa today does not reflect those projections, though the structural advantage he describes remains. Ethereum illustrates adoption, yet adoption does not always equal maximum reliability for ownership data.
Tokenization demands permanence, durability, and security. Ivan Ivanov uses a simple example: storing a land certificate. His question becomes whether users would accept a chain with centralized rollups or stake-driven influence as the protector of their ownership rights.
Read Also: Did Polymarket Traders Front-Run a $1B Bitcoin Buy? Community Split After “Insider” Signals
Kaspa stands out because it eliminates these risks. KAS price will fluctuate, yet the network’s design remains its real value proposition. Ethereum offers unparalleled adoption, though its architecture introduces trust layers that some may choose to avoid.
The tokenized asset market could reach $15T by 2030, with more than half tied to real estate and financial instruments. Ivan Ivanov believes these sectors require the highest possible security standards. He argues that Kaspa’s decentralization and scalability place it in a position where capturing a meaningful share of that value becomes plausible.
Ethereum and market presence will continue shaping tokenization, though network philosophy may determine which chain becomes the preferred settlement layer for ownership records.
Kaspa token sits at the intersection of security-focused design and a rapidly expanding asset class. Ethereum remains dominant, yet Ivan Ivanov’s argument opens a broader conversation about which infrastructure is best suited for storing trillions in tokenized value.
Subscribe to our YouTube channel for daily crypto updates, market insights, and expert analysis.
